From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 24 07:20:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C9C16A400 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:20:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09B943D45 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:20:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3O7KL56017611 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:20:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k3O7KLBe017610; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:20:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:20:21 GMT Message-Id: <200604240720.k3O7KLBe017610@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Maxim Konovalov Cc: Subject: Re: bin/96248: vipw fail on RO /etc X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Maxim Konovalov List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:20:22 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/96248; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Maxim Konovalov To: Alex Kozlov Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/96248: vipw fail on RO /etc Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:17:08 +0400 (MSD) [...] > if rootfs mount as read-only, vipw fall to execute witch vipw: > pw_tmp(): Read-only file system error. > >How-To-Repeat: > #mount |grep -w / > /dev/da0s1 on / (ufs, local, read-only) > > #vipw > vipw: pw_tmp(): Read-only file system > >Fix: > Change temporary file patch in pw_tmp() from > > if (snprintf(tempname, sizeof(tempname), "%.*spw.XXXXXX", > (int)(p - masterpasswd), masterpasswd) >= (int)sizeof(tempname)) { > > to more appropriate? And what is more appropriate? -- Maxim Konovalov