From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 16:43:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA1716A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:43:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx01.ewc.edu (mx01.ewc.edu [68.152.80.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C33A43D1F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:43:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mjoyner@vbservices.net) Received: from [192.168.4.160] (host-161.firewall.ewc.edu [68.152.80.161]) by mx01.ewc.edu (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i8UGhexS091074; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:43:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mjoyner@vbservices.net) Message-ID: <415C37B6.7050503@vbservices.net> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:43:34 -0400 From: Michael Joyner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040906 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Forrest Aldrich References: <415A4BB3.3070107@forrie.com> <415BF47F.6070209@vbservices.net> <415C31CB.2070407@forrie.com> In-Reply-To: <415C31CB.2070407@forrie.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:43:59 -0000 NFS EXPORTS must be configured manually per ip per uid so if you have 15 UIDS you need to map ownership on files via NFS to say 5 workstations you have to do 15*5 configurations via a webform. will not talk Windows 2003 AD I have 3 here (bought before my time), and absolutely hate them. Forrest Aldrich wrote: > Care to qualify that statement? (ie: back it up with useful information, > and not rhetoric ;-)) > > > > > Michael Joyner wrote: > >>> I'd be curious of performance stats you may have experience with on >>> this scenario. We could could also get a NAS-type device that isn't >>> as high-end as >>> Netapp (Snap Appliance?). >>> >> >> Snap Servers are *EVIL* >> Run Away! > >