From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 9 12:05:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA14521 for current-outgoing; Mon, 9 Feb 1998 12:05:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA14461 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 1998 12:05:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pb@fasterix.frmug.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.8.8/frmug-2.2/nospam) with UUCP id VAA19287; Mon, 9 Feb 1998 21:05:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pb@fasterix.frmug.org) Received: (from pb@localhost) by fasterix.frmug.org (8.8.8/8.8.5/pb-19970302) id VAA24116; Mon, 9 Feb 1998 21:03:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <19980209210343.OU10756@@> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 1998 21:03:44 +0100 From: pb@fasterix.freenix.org (Pierre Beyssac) To: eivind@yes.no (Eivind Eklund) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Heads up: static -ification References: <19980209064733.56080@follo.net> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.59.1e Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <19980209064733.56080@follo.net>; from Eivind Eklund on Feb 9, 1998 06:47:33 +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Eivind Eklund writes: > I'm just about to commit a change that staticize close to everything that > can be staticized and doesn't look unreasonable to staticize (almost 400 > variables and functions). Just out of curiosity, what's the rationale for this? Smaller stack footprint? Faster access to said variables? -- Pierre Beyssac pb@fasterix.frmug.org pb@fasterix.freenix.org {Free,Net,Open}BSD, Linux : il y a moins bien, mais c'est plus cher Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager@EU.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe current" in the body of the message