From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Sep 8 13:31:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4BF14C1C for ; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 13:31:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA26458; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 15:31:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from sji-ca2-52.ix.netcom.com(205.186.212.52) by dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id rma026255; Wed Sep 8 15:30:44 1999 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id NAA30068; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 13:30:40 -0700 (PDT) To: Bill Fenner Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bouncing MAINTAINER email? References: <199909072143.OAA11259@windsor.research.att.com> From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 08 Sep 1999 13:30:40 -0700 In-Reply-To: Bill Fenner's message of "Tue, 7 Sep 1999 14:43:43 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 12 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Bill Fenner * I have a nice collection of bounces for messages that I send to * port MAINTAINER=s from the distfile survey. Anyone have any * ideas on a policy for handling this (like, 3 "no such user" * bounces in a row == delete MAINTAINER= line from Makefile? * What about less obvious cases, like timeouts?)? As long as the 3 bounces are spaced (like at least one week apart), that sounds like a reasonable thing to do. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message