Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:05:22 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How are [MAINTAINER] patches handled and why aren't PRs FIFO? Message-ID: <4DB97422.5090102@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110427192555.65add0de@seibercom.net> References: <4DB7B237.7000603@marino.st> <BANLkTinoGufNYZmkFgQmwGR4RjBXWXcDTA@mail.gmail.com> <20110427075436.70ae18ac@seibercom.net> <19896.4396.161941.282904@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20110427093258.3966cfd2@seibercom.net> <20110427134836.GA30085@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <20110427101257.414aaf8b@seibercom.net> <4DB89EB5.2010603@FreeBSD.org> <20110427192555.65add0de@seibercom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 28.04.2011 01:25, schrieb Jerry: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:54:45 +0200 > Olli Hauer <ohauer@FreeBSD.org> articulated: > >> Maybe you have some time to spend? > > Before I could reasonable be expected to set aside time, I would need a > detailed job description, etcetera. Perhaps you can supply me with one? See, and that's what committers might think, too: 'before I do lots of paperwork, I get something else done.' Be that some PR filed by someone else than you, or reading a book rather than doing ports work. :-) Counting recreation into "something else" because it's also useful to make any headway sustainably.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DB97422.5090102>