From owner-freebsd-current Fri Aug 3 19:51:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (bazooka.unixfreak.org [63.198.170.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7397837B406 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 19:51:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dima@unixfreak.org) Received: by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CB17D3E28; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 19:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBE63C12C; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 19:50:29 -0700 (PDT) To: Jun Kuriyama Cc: Current Subject: Re: named -u bind In-Reply-To: <7mitg4lg4y.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp>; from kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp on "Sat, 04 Aug 2001 11:21:01 +0900" Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 19:50:24 -0700 From: Dima Dorfman Message-Id: <20010804025029.CB17D3E28@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jun Kuriyama writes: > --Multipart_Sat_Aug__4_11:21:01_2001-1 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > > Are there any reasons not to use "-u bind" flag for named by default? IIRC the last time this came up somebody said something about it not being able to read zonefiles in some odd places where they like to put them. I.e., they want it to run as root so they can set their zonefile mode 600 or something. > # Or importing code to use chroot from OpenBSD? Import code? BIND can run in a chroot just fine. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message