Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 19:50:24 -0700 From: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> To: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> Cc: Current <FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: named -u bind Message-ID: <20010804025029.CB17D3E28@bazooka.unixfreak.org> In-Reply-To: <7mitg4lg4y.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp>; from kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp on "Sat, 04 Aug 2001 11:21:01 %2B0900"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> writes: > --Multipart_Sat_Aug__4_11:21:01_2001-1 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > > Are there any reasons not to use "-u bind" flag for named by default? IIRC the last time this came up somebody said something about it not being able to read zonefiles in some odd places where they like to put them. I.e., they want it to run as root so they can set their zonefile mode 600 or something. > # Or importing code to use chroot from OpenBSD? Import code? BIND can run in a chroot just fine. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010804025029.CB17D3E28>