From owner-freebsd-arch  Thu Nov 21 11:20:56 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41A037B404
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:20:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B047343E3B
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:20:53 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.pr.watson.org [192.0.2.3])
	by fledge.watson.org (8.12.6/8.12.5) with SMTP id gALJKeBF009924;
	Thu, 21 Nov 2002 14:20:41 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 14:20:40 -0500 (EST)
From: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org
To: Janos Mohacsi <mohacsi@niif.hu>
Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>,
	kjc@csl.sony.co.jp
Subject: Re: TCP ECN merge possible from ALTQ? 
In-Reply-To: <20021121095741.C48490-100000@evil.ki.iif.hu>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021121142001.97258R-100000@fledge.watson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Drop Jonathan Lemon an e-mail.  One of the items in our contract with him
was to cover a TCP ECN implementation.  That said, ECN has generated a
fair amount of controversy.  We do support some ECN stuff for IPsec
tunnels already.

Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
robert@fledge.watson.org      Network Associates Laboratories

On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Janos Mohacsi wrote:

> Hello to all,
> 
> 	Is it possible to merge from ALTQ the TCP_ECN part to the
> FreeBSD-current later to FreeBSD-stable?
> 
> 	Luigi I have seen your and Alfred Perlstein comments on TCP SACK.
> What do you think about TCP_ECN? Is it worth including in the FreeBSD?
> According to measurement of Sally Floyd, It is worth using it.
> 	What do you think merging to -current?
> Best Regards,
> 		Janos Mohacsi
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message