From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Mar 9 17:26:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6F5268308; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:26:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48blWr04tMz3N4b; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:26:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 029HQbjT083335 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:26:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 029HQb5n083334; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:26:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:26:37 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Cy Schubert Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ed Maste , current Subject: Re: Is amd automount still supported in 13.0 or not? Message-ID: <20200309172637.GB83139@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20200203232333.GA37109@rancor.immure.com> <20200204.085435.139942824021996563.yasu@utahime.org> <20200204154650.GA39757@rancor.immure.com> <20200204161505.GN1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200308172301.GF59792@rancor.immure.com> <23042BDF-0E61-4AF1-A95F-E8134D705A42@cschubert.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <23042BDF-0E61-4AF1-A95F-E8134D705A42@cschubert.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48blWr04tMz3N4b X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.53 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.37)[ip: (0.18), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.08), asn: 7018(1.63), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.996,0]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.97)[0.969,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 17:26:50 -0000 On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 08:35:58AM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > On March 9, 2020 7:49:34 AM PDT, Ed Maste wrote: > >On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 at 13:23, Bob Willcox wrote: > >> > >> Thanks for the tip! That worked for me. I guess from reading the > >documentation > >> I didn't pick up on staying with the symlinks and simply changing > >host to net. > > > >Glad it's working for you! Is there anything else that you found > >tricky or surprising in migrating? Perhaps we could produce a > >quick-reference transition guide. > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > >https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >"freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > /net and indirect maps should be simple conversations. Direct maps may or may not be easy. Autofs doesn't support nested direct maps like amd does. You may need to mount elsewhere or use /net with symlinks. > > We do have a port as well. The port will be retired after a reasonable amount of time to allow people to convert. Amd upstream has told me he no longer supports amd. His advice is to use autofs. Yes, and I considered installing the amd port but that just seemed like I'd be postponing the inevitable. Since I had a simple use case of just using symlinks to about four of my remote filesystems, switching from using the /host symlink to the /net symlink was pretty easy. -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX |