From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Feb 21 13: 0:48 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E932837B401; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:00:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01.attbi.com [204.127.202.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3531F43FAF; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:00:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org (12-232-168-4.client.attbi.com[12.232.168.4]) by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01) with ESMTP id <200302212100440010018ls1e>; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 21:00:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA52097; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:00:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:00:42 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: des@freebsd.org Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: PAM question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG So I see we seem to ahve two sets of PAM code, and pam_unix.c exists in both of them. What is teh situation with this.? As a PAM nega_expert (xp--) I'm confused. One of our custommers wants to install pam_tally but I see that it was removed a few years ago.. Why was it removed? did it not work? does it work? Does the fact that it is in contrib/lib/libpam mean it won't work with lib/libpam....? Inquiring minds want to know.. also: Are there any good references on the state of play with PAM? e.g. that explains why we have 2 sets of it etc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message