From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Mar 23 11:44:04 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA23712
          for questions-outgoing; Sun, 23 Mar 1997 11:44:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.28])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA23707
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 1997 11:44:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA09112; Sun, 23 Mar 1997 11:43:56 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 1997 11:43:55 -0800 (PST)
From: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
To: Francis Yeung <fyeung@fyeung8.netific.com>
cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: arch ?
In-Reply-To: <9703230053.AA20566@fyeung8.netific.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970323114307.5369I-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 22 Mar 1997, Francis Yeung wrote:

> 	I know that I can use "uname" for "arch" for most cases. 
> 
> 	But, is "arch" still around in FreeBSD ?

Not on this 2.1.5-RELEASE machine.

Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | Residence Networking Assistant
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major