Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 20:20:58 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm@inbox.lv> Cc: FreeBSD ports <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: x11-wm/xwmm [WAS: Possibly unbuildable ports reminder] Message-ID: <40A50E0A.6060405@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <200405141036.12208.ringworm@inbox.lv> References: <200405141700.i4EH0gSp024041@freefall.freebsd.org> <200405141036.12208.ringworm@inbox.lv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael C. Shultz wrote: [...] > ===> xwmm-0.7_1 depends on shared library: qt2.4 - not found > ===> Verifying install for qt2.4 in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt23 > ===> Vulnerability check disabled > > NOTICE > > You have QT3 files installed! Installing this port > will result in conflicts between QT3 and QT2! > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /speed/usr.ports/x11-toolkits/qt23. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /speed/usr.ports/x11-wm/xwmm. > mike:/usr/ports/x11-wm/xwmm> > > > My question is, should a PR be submitted requesting this port be > dropped? I know I don't want QT2 on my system and assume most others > feel the same way. If a PR is appropriate to request this port be > dropped I'll be happy to submit it. This would be a request to drop x11-toolkits/qt23 and dependent ports, which you should discuss on kde@ first. Or, you could submit a list of affected ports that are old and should be marked deprecated. As you can see, the port builds fine on architectures != alpha.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40A50E0A.6060405>