From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jul 18 17:40:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA1AB9D98C for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (unknown [IPv6:2602:304:b010:ef20::f2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.catspoiler.org", Issuer "gw.catspoiler.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12BA2121B; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u6IHei4V047645; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:40:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201607181740.u6IHei4V047645@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:40:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: zfs solaris assert panic in 11.0-ALPHA5 r302256 To: avg@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <502b6f5c-b27e-b21f-023d-aa6e0943430c@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:40:52 -0000 On 18 Jul, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 08/07/2016 07:13, Don Lewis wrote: >> My package buiding machine just crashed with this panic during a >> poudriere run: >> >> panic: solaris assert: (dn->dn_phys->dn_nlevels == 0 && db->db_level == 0) || dn->dn_phys->dn_nlevels > db->db_level || dn->dn_next_nlevels[txgoff] > db->db_level || dn->dn_next_nlevels[(tx->tx_txg-1) & TXG_MASK] > db->db_level || dn->dn_next_nlevels[(tx->tx_txg > > Don, > > do you have a crash dump? > It would be interesting to see a pretty-print of dn, dn->dn_phys, db and > tx in the frame where the assert is hit. I do. Unfortunately kgdb reports that the values of dn and db were optimized out.