From owner-freebsd-current Fri Nov 3 4:29:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from beamer.mchh.siemens.de (beamer.mchh.siemens.de [194.138.158.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B0E37B4C5; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 04:29:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from blues.mchh.siemens.de (mail3.mchh.siemens.de [194.138.158.227] (may be forged)) by beamer.mchh.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA02198; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 13:29:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from mchh246e.demchh201e.icn.siemens.de ([139.21.200.56]) by blues.mchh.siemens.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA20804; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 13:29:34 +0100 (MET) Received: by MCHH246E with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 13:29:33 +0100 Message-ID: <67E0BE167008D31185F60008C7289DA0E12F4A@MCHH218E> From: Reifenberger Michael To: "'Mike Smith'" , "'current@freebsd.org'" Subject: AW: unwanteed halt & powerdown under -current (linuxerator?) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 13:27:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, jes. Thats what I was seeing. Bug or feature of what part? Could the executor be enhanced to avoid this behaviour. (Why is "file" smarter than the executor)? Does the executor rely on assumtions whereas "file" just compare bytes? Bye/2 ------ Michael Reifenberger - IT, UNIX, R/3-Basis Work: Michael.Reifenberger@plaut.de Proj: = Michael.Reifenberger.gp@icn.siemens.de Pers: Michael@Reifenberger.com Webspace: http://www.reifenberger.com > -----Urspr> =FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Mike Smith [SMTP:msmith@freebsd.org] > Gesendet am: Freitag, 3. November 2000 12:57 > An: Reifenberger Michael > Cc: 'current@freebsd.org' > Betreff: Re: unwanteed halt & powerdown under -current (linuxerator?) = >=20 > > Hi, > > >> Hi, > > >> executing /compat/linux/bin/rpm issues a halt and powerdown = under -current > > >> an my TECRA8000. > > >> Is it just me? > > > > > >No. You don't have the Linux module loaded. There's a Linux = system call=20 > > >which (alarmingly) maps to shutdown-and-poweroff if run as a = FreeBSD=20 > > >binary. > > Not really. See my previous mail. > > It seems that a SYSV4 Syscall maps to the evil call. >=20 > Unless you had the SVR4 module loaded, it would still have been run = as a=20 > FreeBSD binary, which would give you exactly the same behaviour. >=20 > --=20 > ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his > rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want > to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force > people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] > V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E >=20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message