From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 8 23:34:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0180F16A4DB for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 23:34:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7712943D4C for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 23:34:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89421DD59F; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 00:34:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03460-01-12; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 00:34:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from metatron.ijs.si (metatron.ijs.si [193.2.4.152]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8891DD4F0; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 00:34:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from idefix.ijs.si (idefix.ijs.si [193.2.4.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by metatron.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A581C00715; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 00:34:16 +0100 (CET) From: Dejan Lesjak To: Matthias Muthmann Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 00:34:15 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502240244.03104.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <200503082338.20540.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <1110322673.18309.6.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1110322673.18309.6.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503090034.15914.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with X.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 23:34:26 -0000 On Tuesday 08 of March 2005 23:57, Matthias Muthmann wrote: > On Di, 2005-03-08 at 23:38 +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > > That would be horrible by my definition :) But after the post from > > Michael G. Jung, I am now a bit puzzled. If I remember correctly, using > > just patch-kbd_sparc_2.c produces unusable codes in last row for you? > > > > > > Dejan > > I was also a little bit confused because of Michael G.'s answer, but > then I read some older posts an Aaron Dudek had the same results like me > with your first patch. > Perhaps Michael built the old "keyboard" driver. > Don't know. Can you try the configuration for keyboard similar to his (ie pc104 as XkbModel)? It seems that that should work instead of type5 (or if you can, try 'X -configure' and see what configuration it spits out). (With patch-kbd_sparc_2.c only, of course) Dejan