From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 14 12:00:53 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from green.homeunix.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 17B5516A4EA; Fri, 14 May 2004 12:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (green@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by green.homeunix.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i4EJ0qTK071958;
	Fri, 14 May 2004 15:00:52 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org)
Message-Id: <200405141900.i4EJ0qTK071958@green.homeunix.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4
To: Joerg Wunsch <joerg@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: Message from Joerg Wunsch <joerg@FreeBSD.org> 
	<200405141846.i4EIkGph072981@repoman.freebsd.org> 
From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 15:00:52 -0400
Sender: green@green.homeunix.org
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/enigma enigma.1 
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 19:00:53 -0000

Joerg Wunsch <joerg@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> joerg       2004/05/14 11:46:16 PDT
> 
>   FreeBSD src repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     usr.bin/enigma       enigma.1 
>   Log:
>   When I wrote this man page more than 5 years ago, I simply didn't
>   understand the true symmetric nature of Enigma, so my description of
>   ``automatically detects that the input is encrypted'' was simply
>   wrong.  Replace that by a more accurate description of why feeding the
>   ciphertext again into the engine will decrypt it.

You may want to amend it into the 21st century regarding what the 
alternatives are for "real" encryption -- perhaps replace all of the 
mentioned alternatives with openssl(1), or just replace bdes(1)...

-- 
Brian Fundakowski Feldman                           \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\
  <> green@FreeBSD.org                               \  The Power to Serve! \
 Opinions expressed are my own.                       \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\