From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 3 01:33:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1624B1065672 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 01:33:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (lefty.soaustin.net [66.135.55.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFF38FC0C for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 01:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 79A378C086; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 20:33:32 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 20:33:32 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Anonymous Message-ID: <20100803013332.GK29173@lonesome.com> References: <86d3u26gi1.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86d3u26gi1.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Do I need an approval to reopen my PRs? (Was: reopen jfbterm related PRs) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 01:33:33 -0000 On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 09:36:54AM +0400, Anonymous wrote: > I think following PRs were closed by mistake > > ports/139107 (bsdmake) > ports/146230 (png14) > ports/146271 (PREFIX) > > The issues they're trying to solve are still present after miwi@'s > commit on 5 Jun. I've reopened them and reassigned them to freebsd-ports-bugs@ so that someone with a fresh perspective can look at them. > Plus one below was closed (not suspended)[1] by sylvio@ due to my delay > to reply. > > ports/137751 (jokosher) Also reopened. > [1] I find it funny that I was given less time to respond than I waited > for committer to look at the PR. For the record, there are currently 1262 ports PRs, of which 1025 are for existing ports, and 122 are for new ports. With this many PRs, the average wait time is going to be nontrivial. We have, however, just added several new ports committers, so perhaps we can hold the line on the backlog in the next few months. mcl