Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 11:45:22 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1 Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1obj Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus Makefile Message-ID: <20020408114522.B89784@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <3CB170B4.4090607@Leidinger.net>; from Alexander@Leidinger.net on Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:28:04AM %2B0100 References: <20020407162550.GE67968@sunbay.com> <20020408165120.S5876-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <20020408004154.A66483@dragon.nuxi.com> <3CB170B4.4090607@Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:28:04AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > My reason for a static cc/cpp0/cc1 has nothing to do with speed, but > > rather to allow one to recover from a bad libc.so or ld-elf.so.1. > > Even if I got hit by a broken ld-elf.so.1 yesterday I think your intend > is questionable. Uh, DON'T tell me my own experiences are wrong! Having a statically linked compiler has saved my ass more than once on the Sparc64 effort. Earlier I was using shared binaries (compiled from FSF sources), and got bit several times by a bad libc.so. > A committer should be able to recover either by > compiling it on another machine/OS(-version), T ALEXANDER SEND ME ANOTHER SUN BOX K PLZ THNX. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020408114522.B89784>