From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 10 17:44:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA4716A4CE; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:44:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B215843D3F; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:44:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])j0AHiifg026312; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:44:45 +0200 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) j0AHiiNg001331; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:44:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost)j0AHiiAq001330; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:44:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:44:44 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Len Conrad Message-ID: <20050110174444.GA1294@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <6.1.1.1.2.20050110103857.045a9a68@81.255.84.73> <20050110101200.W13168@mail.foolishgames.com> <6.1.1.1.2.20050110112254.0486dec0@81.255.84.73> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.1.1.1.2.20050110112254.0486dec0@81.255.84.73> cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildup of Windows time_wait talking to fbsd 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:44:48 -0000 On 2005-01-10 11:26, Len Conrad wrote: >> Just off the top of my head... >> >> You mentioned the freebsd machine is the gateway. Do you have a >> firewall on the host blocking connections from the windows machine? > > a forgotten detail is that the windows machine sends just fine to > the 4.10 gateway for a few minutes, but the time_wait inevitably > builds up, so smtp access from windows to either gateway is ok. > >> Do you have a different kernel configuration between 4.7 and 4.10? > > both GENERIC > >> i.e. do you have something like ipdivert, etc in the kernel on one >> box and not the other? Can the windows machine ping the ip >> 192.168.200.59 as its a different class C? > > sure, basic connectivity is ok. Are you using a firewall? If yes, is it stateful? Can we see the ruleset?