From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Apr  2  5:49:12 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5414914CB3
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Apr 1999 05:49:08 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id NAA18417; Fri, 2 Apr 1999 13:28:42 +0200
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <199904021128.NAA18417@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: DummyNET
To: main@main.ru
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 13:28:41 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <1734.990402@main.ru> from "anatoly v ivanov" at Apr 2, 99 05:36:44 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 835       
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Hi,
> 
> When i'm adding "add pipe N tcp from any to any via ed1"
> rule to my firewall, I'm getting a strange effect:
> default gateway disappears and (of course) network is down,
> until I directly send packets to it.

there have been some fixes recently in dummynet to address this
problem. i think you can just upgrade ip_output.c and things should
work fine.

it took some time to understand the problem, it was Emmanuel Duros who
pointed me to the right direction

	cheers
	luigi

> Of course, I can avoid this rules, but I like this idea:
> limiting default bandwidth via interface.
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> --- avi
> 
> PS: I'm getting such effect on 3.0-R & 3.1-R & in the different
> networks.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message