From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 20:55:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60E816A52C for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:55:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-in-01.arcor-online.net (mail-in-01.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD8843D31 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:55:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from naddy@mips.inka.de) Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (dsl-213-023-059-220.arcor-ip.net [213.23.59.220]) by mail-in-01.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321171350BB for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 21:55:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j13Ktf2d071075 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 21:55:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from naddy@kemoauc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from naddy@localhost) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j13KtfOq071074 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 21:55:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from naddy) Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 21:55:41 +0100 From: Christian Weisgerber To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050203205541.GA70863@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> References: <20050129202425.GA56998@heechee.tobez.org> <20050129220905.46ab86ae.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <41FBFDD9.7070605@mac.com> <48b93f67db4dbc3bcb49c2e1f7e302aa@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48b93f67db4dbc3bcb49c2e1f7e302aa@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] perl symlinks in /usr/bin will be gone X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 20:55:46 -0000 Charles Swiger: > >Why should the authors of those scripts break them for systems which > >have /bin/env? > > Name one such system. [1] There was a discussion about this a few years ago on comp.unix.shell. Let's see... http://tinyurl.com/45zqx Ah, I see, the starting point was actually the reverse assumption that all systems had /bin/env. Somebody mentioned /sbin/env on Irix, but I don't know whether that was instead of /usr/bin/env or in addition to it. Of course I can always handwave in the direction of those hundreds of Linux distributions... -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de