From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Nov 21 10:30:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96786C4C638 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:30:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from John.Kitz@xs4all.nl) Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net (lb3-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net [194.109.24.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.xs4all.nl", Issuer "GlobalSign Domain Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3149B6EE for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:30:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from John.Kitz@xs4all.nl) Received: from picard ([82.95.89.208]) by smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net with ESMTP id AaVi1u00N4VixDu01aVjER; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:29:44 +0100 Reply-To: From: "John W. Kitz" To: "'freebsd-arm'" References: <58306c9b.4e79630a.a07d9.cf58SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <58309eb5.9942620a.e27b3.24f7SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <583197f2.11e2630a.2d4ed.1acfSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <58322974.4e47620a.75a76.9c91SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Creating FreeBSD/arm bootable SD card for Cubieboards from FreeBSD 11.0 image files for Wintel only users. Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:29:36 +0100 Message-ID: <000001d243e2$2d4b5fb0$87e21f10$@Kitz@xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AdJDg/ZZjfkfKvE+QjWUfKdF8/jykwAW3WMw Content-Language: en-us X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:30:58 -0000 Warner, For the time being I'll stick with trying it on a cubieboard2 first. = Thanks for your offer to help should I decide to go with the = cubieboard3, it's very likely I'll have additional questions as things = progress, for the time being thanks for the information provided to me = so far. If I understand the future plans you've outlined correctly, I'd say from = a more or less end-user perspective that would be ideal. It looks like a lot of progress was made through the collective efforts = of many since this relatively cheap hardware first caught my attention = back in October of 2013 (see = https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2013-October/254055= .html). Regards, Jk.