From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 18 14:15:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FE4DE6; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:15:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8C0179; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id o7so2341004wea.22 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 07:15:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UsUrkZV9sNaFcGMcSucdjuBOgxSquaegUTlJD46Ud8E=; b=d6fLKuYoWCruHK6dFW0Z5l/5iluFqdgjDYQdp7YHnqX8JUpjg5b5e4jyRQJKJ9O4Qy tNl7R+pgMSVgWAoUFUj8b36+TuIecE4EWdiZhFjJnU67bPNVZOxTgYzv4ouZyBuw7KJD Mq4oHjvyTc4tvJqCKhfF1AudhpyKigkip+/Sw0ezi7tlYJ6TvZP3DDmad/j88Dfk4FT1 80OZUkrjZ07SsJgqPlU7KrueqEvwDgekJHg8HHluX0Yt9Rg8OZuTBMOV+mCjvrpKDW5e OYuJ361WyRIhoG/tX4et9HcrOI3TnWtZPe7JuGz1ziY8Hcx+B2l+fUvG6p1yxllND//7 qwdg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.142.236 with SMTP id rz12mr19219614wjb.12.1366294512204; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 07:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.217.88.129 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 07:15:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1789865.JtNRVqvDCl@home.alkar.net> References: <1645676.6Cz3TLlJG5@home.alkar.net> <1789865.JtNRVqvDCl@home.alkar.net> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 07:15:12 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -GfUSejUMnQygXO-cEhVt34zFNk Message-ID: Subject: Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623. From: Adrian Chadd To: Artyom Mirgorodskiy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:15:13 -0000 Sigh. Someone's broken the bus or interrupt handling code between -9 and -head. Or ACPI, for all I know. It may even be something to do with RFKILL. Can you please boot verbosely, both on -9 and -head? you don't have to do anything - just capture the logfile /var/run/dmesg.boot and attach them here. Hopefully something glaringly different will stand out. Thanks, adrian On 18 April 2013 07:05, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: > No interrupts at all: > > > > interrupt total rate > > irq1: atkbd0 474 1 > > irq9: acpi0 95 0 > > irq22: ehci1 504 1 > > irq23: ehci0 1037 3 > > irq256: hpet0:t0 8426 30 > > irq257: hpet0:t1 1823 6 > > irq258: hpet0:t2 1992 7 > > irq259: hpet0:t3 2112 7 > > irq264: hdac0 118 0 > > irq265: ahci0 4026 14 > > Total 20607 75 > > > > > > On Thursday 18 April 2013 06:56:14 Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> I've just tested -HEAD on a WB197 (AR9287 + bluetooth.) It works fine. > >> > >> I think it's very likely something to do with the bus enumeration. Can > >> you do a vmstat -i, see if you've seen any ath interrupts? > >> > >> > >> > >> adrian > > -- > > Artyom Mirgorodskiy