From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Apr 24 14:18:58 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF5816A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:18:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F2043D3F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:18:57 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mkb@incubus.de)
Received: from [192.168.2.10] (pD9542A59.dip.t-dialin.net [217.84.42.89])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAEE33FA1;
	Sun, 24 Apr 2005 16:18:49 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <426BAAE4.1040606@incubus.de>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 16:19:16 +0200
From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050423)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
References: <DD8197BD35BCC63A18AF62CB@palle.girgensohn.se>
	<426BA8FA.3080602@samsco.org>
In-Reply-To: <426BA8FA.3080602@samsco.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: stable@freebsd.org
cc: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net>
Subject: Re: background_fsck=no does not work?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:18:58 -0000

Scott Long wrote:

> not always be clean.  Softupdates (hopefully) means that it will be
> consistent and recoverable, but what you're seeing here is normal and

Why "hopefully"?  Aren't people convinced that it works correctly?

mkb.