From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 12 07:33:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DC916A4CE for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 07:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE40D43D54 for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 07:33:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5933F1FFDD6; Wed, 12 May 2004 16:33:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 663B21FFDD5; Wed, 12 May 2004 16:33:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 46EA8154FC; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37CC9154E5; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 14:33:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= In-Reply-To: <40A21BF1.4080502@DeepCore.dk> Message-ID: References: <20040512145212.62e7db1e@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> <40A21BF1.4080502@DeepCore.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=21267353 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 14:33:54 -0000 On Wed, 12 May 2004, S=F8ren Schmidt wrote: Hi, > Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > Could someone tell me what this means (-CURRENT)? > > The WRITE operation was signalled done by the disk by issueing an > interrupt and the finished request was put on a taskqueue to have it > return status to the system. However the timeout code fired because the > taskqueue hadn't been executed yet (it will wait one ome timeout period > before the result is forced through).. > > So there is no harm done, but the taskqueue was slow to respond... as postend to freebsd-amd64 I am getting far too many of those and they won't stop. From time to time there is also ad10: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but taskqueue stalled LBA=3D..= =2E between all the ${subject} lines. The only thing how I can stop this is a hard reset of the machine. --=20 Bjoern A. Zeeb=09=09=09=09bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74=09=09=09=09http://www.zabbadoz.net/