From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 17:01:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35D7106564A for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:01:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851588FC12 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:01:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.101]) by mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C75AFC206; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 08:01:54 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 08:01:54 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200901061649.25762.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200901061649.25762.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901060801.54425.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: David Naylor Subject: Re: Transparent SOCKS proxy (server side)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:01:56 -0000 On Tuesday 06 January 2009 05:49:22 David Naylor wrote: > Hi, > > My ISP's NAT, unfortunately, does not work more than it does. This is a > problem as I need to provide 'direct' internet access for the computers > inside my network. > > I would like to set up a transparent SOCKS proxy (similar to transparent > HTTP proxy, aka squid) on the server. Does anyone know how to do this (and > which ports to use)? This needs to be a server side solution since I am > unable to implement this on the clients... http://www.freshports.org/net/dante/ -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part.