From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Mon Apr  4 18:09:09 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B13DB02589
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon,  4 Apr 2016 18:09:09 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B63919AF
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  4 Apr 2016 18:09:09 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u34I99ND086421
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 18:09:09 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 205053] [NEW PORT] print/sharelatex:  Online collaborative
 LaTeX editor
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 18:09:09 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: rodomar705@gmail.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-205053-13-RFMxlJjbKC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-205053-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-205053-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 18:09:09 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D205053

Rodomar705 <rodomar705@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rodomar705@gmail.com

--- Comment #17 from Rodomar705 <rodomar705@gmail.com> ---
And here i am. I hope that this port will make in the port tree, sooner or
later. Works wonderfully here on 10.3. The only problem for now is managing=
 and
upgrading the port itself, unfortunately. Having to patch the ports tree ea=
ch
time the tree is upgraded it's quite annoying. What's stopping the merge of=
 the
package itself? Just the patches? Maybe back porting the changes to let it =
work
correctly with the current port tree would speedup the merge itself? Or it =
is
just too hard/long to do it?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=