From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jun 4 17:07:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2734B694D2 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2016 17:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "miucha.iecc.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 DV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 747A01776 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2016 17:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 53906 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2016 17:07:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 4 Jun 2016 17:07:55 -0000 Date: 4 Jun 2016 17:07:33 -0000 Message-ID: <20160604170733.21210.qmail@ary.lan> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: dpchrist@holgerdanske.com Subject: Re: Which Perl 5 works best on FreeBSD 10.1? In-Reply-To: <57530161.70403@holgerdanske.com> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2016 17:07:56 -0000 >> Why are you installing 10.1 when 10.3 is availible? > >I want stability, and older usually means more stability. The difference between N.1 and N.3 is mostly bug fixes. You'll find 10.3 at least as stable as 10.1. R's, John