Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:37:31 -0800 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.org> To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/snort Makefile Message-ID: <20040120153731.GF94636@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20040120143117.GB926@chetwood.ru> References: <200401201346.i0KDkKXS086721@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040120141140.GE94636@FreeBSD.org> <20040120143117.GB926@chetwood.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 05:31:17PM +0300, Sergei Kolobov wrote: > On 2004-01-20 at 06:11 -0800, Eivind Eklund wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 05:46:20AM -0800, Sergei Kolobov wrote: > > > Use OPTIONS infrastructure from bsd.port.mk > > > > Mind backing this out for a few hours until we resolve > > Oliver Eikemeier's issues with the use of PORTNAME for > > the storage location? > > Actually, OPTIONS was there already - marcus added it as an example > when he committed bsd.port.mk changes, I guess. So my commit > wasn't necessary at all. I just did a follow-up commit to remove > the duplicate definitions. BTW, I'd like to see OPTIONS near the top > of the Makefile. > > As for backing it out - surely I can back it out if that's necessary. > > There is other thing, though: > > sgk@elf% make > Syntax error: redirection unexpected > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /data/home/sgk/ports/snort.org/snort. > > (even with OPTIONS removed) > > Ideas? No - "it works for me" (both in rev 1.47 and rev 1.48), with a couple of different versions of bsd.port.mk (including the latest one) Perhaps an environment variable or Makefile.inc or similar environemental pollution? Eivind.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040120153731.GF94636>