From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 8 15:35:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D8316A4CE; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 15:35:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (glewis.dsl.xmission.com [166.70.56.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CE143D2D; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 15:35:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (localhost.eyesbeyond.com [127.0.0.1]) i88FZDlT014401; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:35:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i88FZCQH014400; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:35:12 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:35:12 -0600 From: Greg Lewis To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" Message-ID: <20040908153512.GA14213@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <200409071519.i87FJe69032699@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040908023006.GS82881@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040908023006.GS82881@wantadilla.lemis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 src/share/mk bsd.subdir.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 15:35:15 -0000 On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:00:06PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Tuesday, 7 September 2004 at 15:19:40 +0000, Warner Losh wrote: > > imp 2004-09-07 15:19:40 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > . Makefile.inc1 > > share/mk bsd.subdir.mk > > Log: > > Although 'Unanimous Consent' appears to be a well defined and used in > > the US Senate, Canadian Parliament and Australian Senate, it was > > causing some confusion. > > Indeed, including the notion that it's used in the Australian Senate. > You'll recall the discussions that the South Australian Senate > understands the term, but they don't use it. To quote the December > 2003 core report: > > - grog reports a discussion with a member of the SA Senate. The term > "unanimous consent" is not used in Australian politics, and it could > be interpreted both ways. Any interpretation would be subject to > quorum requirements. Either you had a discussion with a South Australian Senator (i.e., a member of the Australian Senate elected to represent the state of South Australia) or you had a discussion with a Member of the Legislative Council. You can't have had a discussion with a member of the South Australian Senate since the upper house of the South Australian state parliament isn't called the Senate, its called the Legislative Council. :) -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org