From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 23:46:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F8E1065670 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 23:46:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA7E8FC19 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 23:46:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E541CC91; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:46:51 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 01:46:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080401181836.13596owuuxf9az48@mail.top-consulting.net> In-Reply-To: <20080401181836.13596owuuxf9az48@mail.top-consulting.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804020146.49429.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: freebsd@top-consulting.net Subject: Re: FreeBSD Traffic Shaping X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:46:52 -0000 On Wednesday 02 April 2008 00:18:36 freebsd@top-consulting.net wrote: > I've tried dummynet but it doesn't do what I need because if I define > a pipe with 1mbps and if I have 1000 connections, each connection will > have less than 50kbps. > > Any way to do this in FreeBSD ? No, unfortunately your ISP gives you bandwidth, not FreeBSD. You can give yourself the illusion of guarenteed bandwidth using HFSC and pf altq, but at 500% of max bandwidth it is nothing more then an illusion. That's aside from the fact that HFSC only allows 75% of capacity to be designated as 'realtime'. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part.