From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 22 19:09:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F41A1065672 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gh0-f182.google.com (mail-gh0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0788FC14 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghrr20 with SMTP id r20so1307901ghr.13 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 12:09:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WUy3jiQ9xqmm9L/HNcdsCBEFdpfiuzFmuykUleIuMBM=; b=ektJ3RJg8DFFMmDgm0f5jogniIeKwpP1UCaN1dpdl/B/KTcXYmr1Sz+c2Fbp+nu87w GxqiH4WvJ5GyO8x3EQTcGd2Z7httRGu/mNlSDJGuNuoW6uzqcp5APLCL4rZFOOgkm/zZ XGvRdTCEO9qITJNX08OS3nar7IH4vffvlTldo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=WUy3jiQ9xqmm9L/HNcdsCBEFdpfiuzFmuykUleIuMBM=; b=XhVzm1Ko6n+1AKEeaG021Y4urxv0as7qzOU7RxfoUaMcXWof744ZqmP7JJ1sccNzLC O7rV4MUBiXCozKsKc1SfH+zVV3D//pnXWcIOOqc2MickOyS8RaMXqqEv+ztZ97F30g3U Iqak8POqI2OTERxcTK8CBZxoAWGjYgDVjd4NrlOvgsEH+9td4V1SmzUuDVt2/5uOfWHN ZBJfpT5FaXOmOsr5IaY9wHblDsJuTPWnP8CPLYulA23ovex19/tn1NnNgNCkAquHyIfV e1AD2WAmngt1Aj34GCvZBxD9uxHm7Y9ty2NghZ6QqYa4ce2FE5bNZKD8dbNwpslpah9Y +xhw== Received: by 10.236.173.9 with SMTP id u9mr8538271yhl.129.1348340953214; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 12:09:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m51sm18021972yhh.16.2012.09.22.12.09.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 22 Sep 2012 12:09:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3XPLnf5mQQz2CG60 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:09:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:09:10 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120922150910.61331e26@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: <20120922083943.5ca19d4e@scorpio> <505DB271.9000509@mouf.net> <20120922102234.42513900@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnT0rC5jHNVpMa73FBbsfwW23j61/5L2t9p1yjAk5UzhGwVEKzN1pocY9cfEMoy6Gaq17Zp Subject: Re: Installation of "kdenetwork-4.8.4_2" fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:09:14 -0000 On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:56:22 +0100 Chris Rees articulated: > On 22 September 2012 15:22, Jerry wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 08:43:29 -0400 > > Steve Wills articulated: > > > >> Please see the 20120908 entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING. > > > > Been there, done that, doesn't make any difference. My question is > > why should I have to delete the never version "libotr-4.0.0" which > > "kdenetwork-4.8.4_1" is currently linked against to install > > "libotr-3.2.1" so that I can update " kdenetwork-4.8.4" to the > > latest version? Apparently, deleting a previously installed version > > of "libotr-4.0.0" is the only way to eliminate this problem. > > http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/kdenetwork-lib-dep.diff > > This patch is untested, but if you really have successfully linked > kdenetwork with libotr-4.0.0 then it should work no problem. > > Please let us know. > > Chris I had all ready deleted the "libotr-4.0.0" port and rebuild kdenetwork-4.8.4 with the older "libotr" port. I applied your patch and then rebuild "kdenetwork-4.8.4"; however, it built with the older version of "libotr". I guess I will have to remove that version first and then attempt to rebuild the "kdenetwork-4.8.4" port. Unfortunately, that will have to wait until tomorrow. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________