From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 12 02:59:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574E4106566B; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 02:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mouf.net (unknown [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:4400:216:3eff:fe69:33b2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED91E8FC08; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 02:59:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from meatwad.mouf.net (cpe-024-162-230-236.nc.res.rr.com [24.162.230.236]) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAC2xG9M088581 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:59:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4EBDE104.9030004@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:59:16 -0500 From: Steve Wills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110531 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Sedov References: <20111111143115.5bf5d195.stas@FreeBSD.org> <20111111181823.089d72be.stas@FreeBSD.org> <4EBDDABE.5030304@FreeBSD.org> <20111111183724.5712e1e2.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20111111183724.5712e1e2.stas@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]); Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:59:18 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What changed? (gem command missing in 1.9) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 02:59:19 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/11/11 21:37, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:32:30 -0500 > Steve Wills mentioned: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 11/11/11 21:18, Stanislav Sedov wrote: >>> Yes, we can actually do that. We're discussing the possibility of making >>> lang/ruby19 to depend on ruby-gems and rake, thus having ruby19 installation >>> automatically install rake and gem as well. But nobody did that yet. >>> >>> I agree tought that should have been done at the moment the gem binary >>> was dropped from ruby19, but I think we just forgot about this at the >>> end. >>> >> >> Does the attached simple patch (untested) cover it or is more needed? >> > > I believe it might do. I'm not sure though you can run depend on something > that build depends on you, so it needs testing. > Nevermind, that build loops trying to build ruby-gems. I'll look at it some more. Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOveEDAAoJEPXPYrMgexuhJWIH/i+zGiBlwWcusAXGkoczJ56b dZWywhwGZ8sdmT+Eq6Rqoh2DTogUb10HX6d2onfXIurvCxMM2vakfNP4qzSbWXKd o8r3RNpEz5adDiFrqyK3OmGGOjtaP1b8QkQ5ymE9N6pSPUVhntTSSfXVwbfDzkda 16izZfypbtja1gYZ7qDC4V2Yqm3VU3ETC41E0JkEhGyLk0aL+Dp0H9RV9vivv1W5 lfE0i9pJqAaHmg5QphXXHZWsaQqtWFsZQyCj+UsLgHZu5klNC+RmSVmyuq1jJhV4 X99PQAzZUhsxo3xHHqACRq5FJC2923Ug7PXiJxKH/vvZaYX5k8E7FxHZ/3MUwXQ= =Z9UJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----