From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 8 15:06:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8901116A41F for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 15:06:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lydianconcepts@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D78A43D46 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 15:06:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lydianconcepts@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so914720rne for ; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:06:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aBOhH0RkO1nRyVovrrXbfhu3n1MN87DMLVOdWHusLB0QF+0IGp5i5nXTeRfi7dKuoZYK/7Qjg0k7uVBzFLBvD66/76l6KtEg6s8kZ1yDu0s0Y8LQw1pH7yLJgA9TY0PYmjEjDf403ZLdREG13+BukMl8q63uLLlT8STujFRpOwc= Received: by 10.39.3.19 with SMTP id f19mr2592733rni; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.104.60 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7579f7fb05080808066c205a08@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:06:13 -0700 From: Matthew Jacob To: Danny Braniss In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CAM, SCSIn/iSCSI & LUNs X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 15:06:14 -0000 People have yacked for years about implementing REPORT_LUNS within FreeBSD/CAM. I mean, Windows has only used it for the last 8 years, so it's probably okay. It's been nothing but talk really so far. On 8/8/05, Danny Braniss wrote: > hi, > it seems that one of the differences between the SCSI1/2/3/4/i > is the size of the LUN :-) >=20 > Now, it seems that the CAM will search sequencially for LUNs, from 0 -> m= ax_lun > which i don't think will scale nicely. >=20 > is there a way to tell the cam to do a scsi report luns command, instead = of > the sequential search? >=20 > danny >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-scsi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >