From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr  4 20:13:29 2003
Return-Path: <owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767)
	id 45DFF37B405; Fri,  4 Apr 2003 20:13:28 -0800 (PST)
Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D838837B401
	for <perforce@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 Apr 2003 20:13:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org [216.136.204.115])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518B043F93
	for <perforce@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 Apr 2003 20:13:27 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from peter@freebsd.org)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h354DR0U003644
	for <perforce@freebsd.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:13:27 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from peter@freebsd.org)
Received: (from perforce@localhost)
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h354DQ3c003641
	for perforce@freebsd.org; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:13:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:13:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200304050413.h354DQ3c003641@repoman.freebsd.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: repoman.freebsd.org: perforce set sender to
	peter@freebsd.org using -f
From: Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org>
To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Subject: PERFORCE change 28159 for review
X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: p4 projects tree changes <p4-projects.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/p4-projects>,
	<mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/p4-projects>
List-Post: <mailto:p4-projects@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/p4-projects>,
	<mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 04:13:29 -0000

http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=28159

Change 28159 by peter@peter_overcee on 2003/04/04 20:13:01

	we wont be saving %gs in the trapframe for now.  We should, but I
	dont have to just yet.  When we start using the swapgs instruction
	for fast syscalls, we will have to use %gs for local storage rather
	than %fs, which means we'll save/restore %gs instead of %fs.  This
	segment saving thing is all up in the air anyway and is probably
	bogus since there aren't segment registers in the i386 sense.

Affected files ...

.. //depot/projects/hammer/sys/x86_64/include/frame.h#5 edit

Differences ...

==== //depot/projects/hammer/sys/x86_64/include/frame.h#5 (text+ko) ====

@@ -49,7 +49,6 @@
  */
 
 struct trapframe {
-	int64_t	tf_gs;
 	int64_t	tf_fs;
 	int64_t	tf_es;
 	int64_t	tf_ds;
@@ -83,7 +82,6 @@
 
 struct intrframe {
 	int64_t	if_vec;
-	int64_t	if_gs;
 	int64_t	if_fs;
 	int64_t	if_es;
 	int64_t	if_ds;
@@ -117,7 +115,6 @@
 
 struct clockframe {
 	int64_t	cf_vec;
-	int64_t	cf_gs;
 	int64_t	cf_fs;
 	int64_t	cf_es;
 	int64_t	cf_ds;