From owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org  Fri Aug 12 09:48:27 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED59BB7523
 for <freebsd-ipfw@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:48:27 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21C40152D
 for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:48:26 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id u7C9mMPo090665;
 Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:48:22 +1000 (EST)
 (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:48:22 +1000 (EST)
From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
To: grenville armitage <garmitage@swin.edu.au>
cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: your thoughts on a particualar ipfw action.
In-Reply-To: <57AD7180.2060609@swin.edu.au>
Message-ID: <20160812184408.G79687@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
References: <20160805024301.H56585@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
 <B26AAEC0-593A-46D9-A22F-F6B4B78E7E8E@obsigna.com>
 <7486c7ce-49db-b6b9-a6bb-13f04b4ce6d6@freebsd.org>
 <F3D40C57-831D-4A7C-B84B-8DA34E4DC701@obsigna.com>
 <242DF6D8-4287-43BF-BE9F-CE1665D31ED2@obsigna.com>
 <9D024314-57A2-4079-B630-FB0D844DD5B5@obsigna.com>
 <1123ab7a-3365-d059-7d53-862d4edafe7e@freebsd.org>
 <57AD7180.2060609@swin.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ipfw>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:48:27 -0000

On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:49:36 +1000, grenville armitage wrote:
 > On 08/12/2016 14:56, Julian Elischer wrote:
 > > On 11/08/2016 9:02 AM, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote:
 > >>
 >      [...]
 > >>
 > >> I needed to change the name of the geoip tool, because GeoIP® is a
 > registered trademark of MaxMind, Inc., see www.maxmind.com. The name of the
 > tool is now 'ipup' = abbreviated form of  IP geo location table generation
 > and look- UP , that is without the boring middle part :-D

 > > Hmm I'd have gone for geotable. ipup sounds like a young dog produced by
 > > Apple.
 > > (wonder if one can change the name of a port)

:)  The Sony Aibo had the robotic dog genre pretty well covered.

 > +1 FWIW.

Portname is sysutils/ipdbtools which sounds ok, so it's only one program 
could be renamed (again).  The port is young enough that it wouldn't be 
likely to inconvenience anybody much - except Rolf! - at this stage.

cheers, Ian