From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Aug 21 14:19:08 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31343DDE94F for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:19:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEC9B71BB9; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:19:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id v7LEIUk2049477; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:18:31 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:18:30 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Glen Barber cc: Marius Strobl , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.4-BETA1 Now Available In-Reply-To: <20170821131834.GH49635@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20170822001300.S19528@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20170819210401.GB71127@alchemy.franken.de> <20170821191212.M19528@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20170821131834.GH49635@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:19:08 -0000 On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:18:34 +0000, Glen Barber wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 07:20:06PM +1000, Ian Smith wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 23:04:01 +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > o The 2017Q3 package set used in the 10.4-RELEASE cycle does not include > > > KDE4 packages for amd64 and i386. Thus, such packages are not part of > > > the amd64 and i386 DVD images either. > > > > Does this imply that KDE4 pkgs should be included in later BETA|RC DVDs? > > > > Thanks for all your good work, folks. > > > > They should be, yes. It seems the Solar Eclipse interfered with pkg(8) > fetching from the mirrors for BETA1. Thanks, but is pkg(8) STILL not eclipse-proof? I want my money back! cheers, Ian