From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 2 18:31:28 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA20175 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 18:31:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from werple.net.au (melb.werple.net.au [203.9.190.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA20169 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 18:31:23 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 19439 invoked by uid 5); 3 Apr 1997 02:31:20 -0000 Received: (from jb@localhost) by freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA14864; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 11:33:05 +1000 (EST) From: John Birrell Message-Id: <199704030133.LAA14864@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> Subject: Re: Bugs in libc_r (fwd) To: nw1@cs.wustl.edu (Nanbor Wang) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 11:33:04 +1000 (EST) Cc: jb@cimlogic.com.au, Hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199704021608.KAA17928@siesta.cs.wustl.edu> from Nanbor Wang at "Apr 2, 97 10:08:54 am" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Nanbor Wang wrote: > > > Anyway we can get an update of this fix? (I don't want to get into > > > -current at this moment ;-) > > > > I've checked the libc_r source that was tagged for 2.2 and there have > > been a lot of updates to uthread files since then. Enough to prevent > > patching the 2.2 tree (despite what I said earlier 8-). Sorry. We'll > > need to be in better shape for 3.0. > > Sorry, John. What I really meant was Lite2 merge. I am using > -current before lite2 merge. (before 2/9/97 ?) Can I patch the > pthread library? Thanks. Just CVSup the libc_r tree. I doubt that there are any Lite2 issues that would get in the way. Regards, -- John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@netbsd.org; jb@freebsd.org CIMlogic Pty Ltd, 119 Cecil Street, South Melbourne Vic 3205, Australia Tel +61 3 9690 6900 Fax +61 3 9690 6650 Mob +61 418 353 137