From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 01:20:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99AC816A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 01:20:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872FF43D5F for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 01:20:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB70jtfT025519; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 11:15:56 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: buga@auug.org.au Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 11:15:54 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200412071106.50575.bastill@adam.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200412071106.50575.bastill@adam.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2088885.kpsthxmqYb"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200412071115.55279.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -5.4 () IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [BUGA] Installing FBSD 5.3 and 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 01:20:50 -0000 --nextPart2088885.kpsthxmqYb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 02:36, Brian Astill wrote: > I guess there is some small incompatibility between my system and FBSD. > Whatever .. the effect was that as I kept CVSupdating from FBSD 4.7 > through 4.10 I gradually lost usability as first one program then > another, failed. How did they fail? I would be pretty suprised if this happened to me :) > Question 1. Is this plan sensible and/or practical? > Question 2. If the answer to (1.) is "No", what alternative would you > suggest? I wouldn't bother.. You should be able to source upgrade through the entire 5.x series after 5.= 3=20 without _too_ much hassle. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart2088885.kpsthxmqYb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBtP1D5ZPcIHs/zowRAjVrAKCZMXQj8mzHAXb14JB/sa0dXWoU4QCgi66g gzZGUAgN9fc2PfjEI+Socvs= =Uwp6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2088885.kpsthxmqYb--