From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 13:23:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE6E16A420; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:23:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz (e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz [195.122.204.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57A743D49; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:23:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1EDNEAO065095; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:23:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by pav.hide.vol.cz (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1EDNDXE065094; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:23:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: pav.hide.vol.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Pav Lucistnik To: Luigi Rizzo In-Reply-To: <20060214051934.A66704@xorpc.icir.org> References: <200602141310.k1EDACg3098670@repoman.freebsd.org> <1139922838.64601.2.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20060214051934.A66704@xorpc.icir.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zAZb07wZXkqwbDoVowT6" Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:23:13 +0100 Message-Id: <1139923393.64601.4.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Luigi Rizzo , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/asterisk-devel Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:23:16 -0000 --=-zAZb07wZXkqwbDoVowT6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Luigi Rizzo p=ED=B9e v =FAt 14. 02. 2006 v 05:19 -0800: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 02:13:58PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > ... > > > Too bad we *must* use spaces for indentation, because > > > TABs are misinterpreted by 'make'... > >=20 > > Uh, what about being consistent with the rest of the Ports tree and not > > indent variables at all inside .if constructs? >=20 > if it is a requirement, sure. > but this way it seems more readable... don't know, > do we have a rule or opinions for one or the other choice ? No rules, it's a matter of personal taste. --=20 Pav Lucistnik It's the classic Microsoft security-bulletin formula: "The vulnerability is important (never dangerous); you have nothing to fear and no reason to regr= et trusting us; we have no intention of apologizing for it or even explaining = it adequately; now go get your patch, shut up, and be grateful nothing bad has happened. -- The Register --=-zAZb07wZXkqwbDoVowT6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBD8dnBntdYP8FOsoIRAvSyAKC3qRO9osbNAZzdXKri01SkSIUj2QCfer6G FAyc2UftiDyA5NikdaePxLk= =hBJr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-zAZb07wZXkqwbDoVowT6--