From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 23:58:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225D116A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 23:58:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.omnis.com (smtp.omnis.com [216.239.128.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2778B43D31 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 23:58:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from softweyr.homeunix.net (66-91-236-204.san.rr.com [66.91.236.204]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41668836B9; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 23:58:05 -0800 (PST) From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr To: Frank Knobbe , stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 23:58:06 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20040122175800.UCGD116070.fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@win2000> <200401221437.28629.skquinn@xevious.kicks-ass.net> <1075014010.789.21.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1075014010.789.21.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401252358.06064.wes@softweyr.com> Subject: Re: cvsup2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 07:58:08 -0000 On Saturday 24 January 2004 11:00 pm, Frank Knobbe wrote: > On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 14:37, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > > On Thursday 2004 January 22 12:50, Craig Boston wrote: > > > On Thursday 22 January 2004 12:10 pm, Will Andrews wrote: > > > > So use another one? Like maybe cvsup12.freebsd.org? :) > > > > > > Sssshhh!!! Don't tell anybody about cvsup12... > > > I like it being really really _FAST_ ;-) > > > > I personally use cvsup11 now. I think I switched several times after > > cvsup2 started reaching capacity some months ago. > > This may be a silly question, but why doesn't cvsup.freebsd.org list > all of the others in a round-robin setup? That way people can still use > their preferred servers directly (e.g. cvsup11.), yet load can be > distributed amongst all of them by just using cvsup.freebsd.org. D00dz: ports/sys/utils/fastest_cvsup is your friend. -- Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket? Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com