From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 16 13:52:09 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88FF16A4B3
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 13:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EFC943FBD
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 13:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 9979 invoked by uid 1000); 16 Sep 2003 20:52:10 -0000
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 13:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Damian Gerow <damian@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030916203116.GG66001@sentex.net>
Message-ID: <20030916134953.M9921@root.org>
References: <20030916115638.U9706@root.org>
	<20030916201814.GF66001@sentex.net>
	<20030916131946.W9900@root.org> <20030916203116.GG66001@sentex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT [SOLVED]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:52:09 -0000

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Damian Gerow wrote:
> Thus spake Nate Lawson (nate@root.org) [16/09/03 16:24]:
> > I have no time to track this down but the output of acpidump -t may help
> > someone else who might be interested.  You're looking for the pointers
> > that are stored in RSD PTR.
>
> I'm still on 5.1-R, and there's no '-t' flag to acpidump.  However, I've
> posted the dump on the web:
>
>     <http://www.sentex.net/~damian/acpidump>
>
> so people can browse as they wish.

As expected, your ACPI tables are at the top of physmem:  RSDT=0x1fff3000.
This is only 52k from 512MB.  Something in how MAXMEM affects setup of
physical memory is truncating physmem by at least 64k.

In short, Don't Do That.

-Nate