From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 23 13:21:11 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B81E16A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:21:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE74643D45
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:21:10 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il)
Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32])
	by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp
	id 1BzEl3-000IWA-VK; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:21:09 +0300
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4
To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@linux.gr>
In-Reply-To: Message from Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@linux.gr> 
   of "Mon, 23 Aug 2004 15:43:44 +0300." <20040823124343.GD2239@gothmog.gr> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:21:09 +0300
From: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Message-Id: <20040823132110.CE74643D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: src/UPDATING 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:21:11 -0000

> On 2004-08-23 10:46, Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> wrote:
> > shouldn't 
> > 	NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 5.x IS SLOW:
> > now be 6.x ...
> 
> Would something like this seem ok to you?  It only mentions FreeBSD-CURRENT
> instead of a specific version, so it will also work for FreeBSD 7.X when
> that comes along.

fine, but what if FreeBSD 7.X is actually faster ... :-)

danny