From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Dec 19 15:29:53 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3208F1338D0E for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:29:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca (smtp-out-no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C9E385370; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:29:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([70.67.125.17]) by shaw.ca with ESMTPA id Zdn9gR1Oo8uQmZdnAgpXPN; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:29:49 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=XKpOtjpE c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=VFtTW3WuZNDh6VkGe7fA3g==:117 a=VFtTW3WuZNDh6VkGe7fA3g==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=2ur7OfE09M0A:10 a=xfDLHkLGAAAA:8 a=hF2rLc1pAAAA:8 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=-TuVeBny641Y19tWTGwA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=iB5APFlFwgEA:10 a=IfaqVvZgccqrtc8gcwf2:22 a=O9OM7dhJW_8Hj9EqqvKN:22 a=Ia-lj3WSrqcvXOmTRaiG:22 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy8 [10.2.2.6]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 191EFC9; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:29:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wBJFTVvs016135; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:29:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from slippy (cy@localhost) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id wBJFTUL4016132; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:29:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com) Message-Id: <201812191529.wBJFTUL4016132@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Authentication-Warning: slippy.cwsent.com: cy owned process doing -bs X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.7.1 Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.cschubert.com/ To: cem@freebsd.org cc: Rick Macklem , freebsd-current Subject: Re: possible POLA violation for NFS server to make it Linux compatible In-Reply-To: Message from Conrad Meyer of "Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:32:49 -0800." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:29:30 -0800 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfNOfV13XbUL+nk2HezgqooqfxS7Zu/oHCCL4P1pVp78d0aSdoAZKIhkrKqkPhgr+1EN0WhrqEPLpK627psM7r8CdjzihmL7eb6X6h5Fw1WzBEVeeKftB F+O+WpPSomW+0u0IcXO1JZzABItws1sTPx3BFcslNDhh74jkovBVCYVDFZYiIQGU0NKW/X0qrU8TDs8RcaN35iwgVEf2R03VRYHGZ+mEH9+jrUL9b8GF1STc zpZKhH6yIlGTnITMfOdUuw== X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1C9E385370 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.95 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[17.125.67.70.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: spqr.komquats.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.981,0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[13.134.59.64.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6327, ipnet:64.59.128.0/20, country:CA]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.26)[ip: (-6.59), ipnet: 64.59.128.0/20(-2.56), asn: 6327(-2.05), country: CA(-0.09)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:29:53 -0000 In message , Conrad Meyer writes: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > The change to make the FreeBSD NFSv4 server use vfs.nfsd.nfs_privport is tr > ivial > > and I think being compatible with Linux is important (I see it as the defac > to > > standard NFS implementation these days). > > > > What do others think I should do? > > Hi Rick, > > I think we should go ahead and honor nfs_privport. Agreed and an UPDATING entry. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.