From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 21:34:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368901065670 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 21:34:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EBD8FC12 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 21:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21051 invoked by uid 399); 7 Jan 2011 21:34:31 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO doug-optiplex.ka9q.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 7 Jan 2011 21:34:31 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4D2786E5.7080907@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:34:29 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101210 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Judge References: <4D243672.4040803@douglasthrift.net> <4D266320.2020803@FreeBSD.org> <4D277015.8010107@FreeBSD.org> <4D2771C4.3040306@FreeBSD.org> <4D277BA5.6020007@tomjudge.com> In-Reply-To: <4D277BA5.6020007@tomjudge.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, ohauer@FreeBSD.org, wxs@FreeBSD.org, Douglas Thrift Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: isc-dhcp41-server-4.1.2,1; Concurrent IPv4 DHCP and DHCPv6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 21:34:32 -0000 On 01/07/2011 12:46, Tom Judge wrote: > Hi Doug, > > I think (imho) the apache style scripts are better than the one in > openvpn for example. > > The main reason for this is that they are more along the lines of how > other platforms have implemented this feature. That's not a reason either to, or not to do something in FreeBSD. The rc.d system is substantially different that sysV style init.d, and has more capabilities in some ways. > Maybe we need a more generic way of doing this rather than each port > providing their own implementation? I agree, and I thought I made that point in my initial post. :) Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/