Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:37:21 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 277333] Mk/Features/lto.mk: passing -C lto=no breaks LTO_UNSAFE ports Message-ID: <bug-277333-7788-QjB5zSfFhB@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-277333-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-277333-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D277333 --- Comment #15 from Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> --- WITHOUT_<FEATURE> in ports' Makefile hasn't been made illegal yet, so ports 2b74e8c0ebd7 used it as a workaround due to 2024Q2 branching soon. As long = as you don't break my ports I ultimately don't care how this is fixed. Alternatively, lang/rust needs to enable PORT_LLVM by default to help plain= LTO like here or cross-LTO in www/firefox and graphics/mesa-devel. Doing so is a lot of work: backport LLVM fixes to devel/llvm* ports, bump LLVM_DEFAULT (or pin to avoid downgrade), prepare for extra maintenance on upgrades and split devel/llvm* into subpackages (Rust only needs LLVM but llvm* packages also include Clang/LLD/LLDB/Flang/etc which take more time to build). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-277333-7788-QjB5zSfFhB>