From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jul 7 07:14:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA02211 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 07:14:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from iglou.com (sendmail@iglou2.iglou.com [192.107.41.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA02206 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 07:14:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from patrick@cre8tivegroup.com) Received: from [204.255.227.87] (helo=gateway.cre8tivegroup.com) by iglou.com with esmtp (8.7.3/8.6.12) id 0ytYVj-0001CT-00; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 10:14:23 -0400 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 07 Jul 1998 10:14:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Patrick Gardella To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Slowest system for ip aliasing Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am considering moving the IP masquerading from my box to a dedicated box. It's sole purpose would be the IP masquerading. As simple as possible. What would be the minimum requirements to route the packets to a 10 machine LAN from iijppp on a dedicated 56K line? We are using 10Base-T networking. Could a '386 handle it? Patrick Gardella To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message