From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 13 18:34:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F251065670 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:34:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE86B8FC16 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29303 invoked by uid 0); 13 Oct 2010 18:34:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 18:34:34 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=O+GbhyylbbWnqIswxwYBJwo9oUjzIp6GMV3p4IwjCnV9f9p3ZUZaIMxtsFZhS9uWahN3dqQT2pPQKjkiNMV0iKP0lEXqEt69gZic4xoIa3YIY1JB6jZ+Pz/0TNh0EJF3; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P669p-0004P2-Kh for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:34:34 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:29:41 -0600 Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:29:41 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101013182941.GA6404@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CB5E081.8070809@rawbw.com> <20101013175107.GA74687@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4CB5F3BA.6050801@rawbw.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: Too many binary packages are missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:34:36 -0000 --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 02:06:55PM -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: >=20 > I think it would be nice if at least one binary package was available with > the most "typical" dependencies. For example, I am not a native English > speaker, but I would not mind using the English version OO if I could > download it as a binary package... Just my $0.02... =2E . . without Java, given Java's licensing restrictions. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAky1+pUACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXejQCg7UuEju+0AXb8Uhf+jVAZxT59 CoMAoMiQ/U4hNwYswNezkYyT95yzxUnq =h+1U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--