From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Mar 29 20:20: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC5F37B752 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 20:20:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id UAA32628; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 20:20:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 20:20:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200003300420.UAA32628@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Subject: Re: ports/12722: New port: AT&T's DjVu library for scanned images Reply-To: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/12722; it has been noted by GNATS. From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/12722: New port: AT&T's DjVu library for scanned images Date: 29 Mar 2000 20:09:40 -0800 * Well, I did not realize, you can not even _fetch_ the interactive ports * :-( Distfile fetching is part of the package building process. * It is not only the license -- the script will extract the source code * out from itself, only if the license is accepted. It can be hacked not * to, but that's very likely to violate the license... Um, can't you put the license part only in REQ? Then the script run after it can do whatever you want it to. Also, I wasn't paying attention to the discussion, but what happens when the user installs it from a package? Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message