From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 17 02:31:38 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9953E106564A;
	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 02:31:38 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from milki@rescomp.berkeley.edu)
Received: from hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu (hal.Rescomp.Berkeley.EDU
	[169.229.70.150])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867D98FC19;
	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 02:31:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix, from userid 1070)
	id 25877119DCE; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:31:36 -0700
From: milki <milki@rescomp.berkeley.edu>
To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20110317023136.GN32667@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu>
References: <1300272269.1973.16.camel@localhost>
	<C9A64EB6.1DFF2%freebsdlists-ruby@chillibear.com>
	<20110316160048.GM32667@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu>
	<20110316134220.d92eb20d.stas@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110316134220.d92eb20d.stas@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: ruby@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: making Ruby 1.9 default
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 02:31:38 -0000

On 13:42 Wed 16 Mar     , Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> > I've been hanging out at #bsdports@efnet and I've gathered that is the
> > consensus of committers that portupgrade is no longer maintained and
> > portmaster is the preferred tool. The docs need some patching to reflect
> > this.
> > 
> 
> It's not true, it's officially maintained by ruby@, which for portupgrade
> was effectively mainly me for the past years.  Unfortunately, I don't have
> enough resources to make significant changes there.

Given that there are so many PRs and I emailed the official maintainer
(ruby@) with a small 2 line patch suggestion and received no feedback,
I'd say its pretty good as not maintained.

--milki